Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 10(10): 23259671221123027, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36329950

RESUMEN

Background: In the National Basketball Association (NBA), lower extremity injuries account for over 70% of games missed, with ankle injuries being the most common. High-quality video analysis has been successful for studying injury mechanism. Purpose: To (1) determine the validity of video-based analysis as a method to evaluate ankle injury mechanisms in NBA players and (2) analyze the circumstances associated with injury, games missed due to injury, and associated costs in player salary due to time missed. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Ankle injuries were identified using an injury report database, and corresponding videos were searched using YouTube.com to access high-quality video evidence of these injuries during the 2015-2020 NBA regular season. We reviewed 822 injuries, of which 93 had corresponding videos (video subset), in our final analysis. Variables including number of games missed, necessity for surgical treatment, and injury recurrence were reported for the entire cohort. In the video subset, the mechanism of injury and other corresponding situational data were evaluated. Results: The most common mechanism of injury occurred via ankle inversion (83.9%; n = 78; P < .001). These injuries were significantly associated with indirect contact with the player's ankle (79.6%; n = 74; P < .001). There were significant differences based on player position, within both the video subset (P = .008) and the entire cohort (P < .001), with guards being injured the most frequently. The average number of games missed due to injury was 7 games in the video subset and 5 games in the entire cohort (P = .14). There were significant differences between the groups in average player salary per game ($133,878 [video subset] versus $87,577 [entire cohort]; P < .001). Conclusion: Despite its low yield of 11.3%, video analysis proved to be a useful tool to determine ankle injury mechanisms as well as the distribution of injuries based on player position. However, this methodology was subject to selection bias, as evidenced by a $50,000 increase in player salary among the video cohort. These findings should be considered when using video analysis in future studies.

2.
Foot Ankle Spec ; 14(4): 302-311, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32312108

RESUMEN

Background: Total ankle arthroplasty is a viable option for the treatment of end stage ankle arthritis. The purpose of this study is to report on the mid-term results with a cemented total ankle prosthesis, the Inbone™ II implant over a 5 year period. Methods: A retrospective, single-center chart and radiographic review of all patients with end stage ankle arthritis treated with Inbone™ II TAR) as the primary index procedure from 12/1/2012 to 3/1/2017. Clinical data were evaluated at 3 month, 6 month, 1 year and subsequent intervals for the study period. Preoperative diagnosis, pertinent patient demographics adjunctive procedures, implant associated complications, subsequent surgeries, and revisions were recorded. Results: 121 total ankles met our inclusion criteria. Patients had an INBONE™ II TAR implant placed with bone cement with a minimum of a 12 months follow up. Average age was 62.88 (range, 32-87) years, average body mass index was 32.74 (range, 21.8-56.04) kg/m2 and average follow up was 28.51(range, 12-69) months. Using the COFAS complication classification there were 14 minor, 11 moderate, and 5 major complications. 6/121 (5.0%) revisions which included: polyethylene exchange, device explant/fusion, and antibiotic spacer in situ. No complications over the course of this study ended in amputation. Conclusion: Total Ankle Arthroplasty utilizing the cemented INBONE™ II yielded good midterm results with regards to minor, moderate, and major complications. Rate of revision 6/121 (5.0%) was within the reported range with only 5 patients converted to fusion during the study period resulting in a 95% survivability at mid-term follow up.Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo , Prótesis Articulares , Articulación del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Falla de Prótesis , Radiografía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Injury ; 48(2): 469-473, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28062098

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous ipsilateral clavicle and acromioclavicular (AC) joint injury have been infrequently reported in the literature at this time. The purpose of this study was to assess incidence as well as assess risk factors for this dual injury pattern. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database (Level III evidence), evaluating 383 adult patients without previous shoulder girdle injury or trauma with a minimum 1-year follow-up who sustained a displaced diaphyseal clavicle fracture. All patients in the study underwent either nonoperative management or surgical reduction and stabilization of a diaphyseal clavicle fracture with a plate and screw construct. Study subjects were followed with serial radiographs. Clavicle and shoulder radiographs, as well as chest radiographs and contralateral films in questionable cases, were used to assess for acromioclavicular joint injury in both operative and nonoperative groups. Additional data was collected on concurrent injuries, patient demographics, fracture characteristics, fixation techniques, surgical/post-operative data, and operative or nonoperative treatment. RESULTS: We found that 13/183 (7.1%) of patients undergoing fixation of a diaphyseal clavicle fracture had an ipsilateral AC joint injury, while 13/200 (6.5%) of patients undergoing conservative management had an ipsilateral AC joint injury. Critical analysis of the data revealed that presence of ipsilateral scapular body fractures, and a likely incidental association with superior plating fixation, were associated with an increased rate of this injury pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Ipsilateral clavicle fracture and AC joint injury is much more common than traditionally believed, with an incidence of 6.8% overall. It is unknown how the presence of an associated AC injury influences outcome, as AC injury was not universally symptomatic.


Asunto(s)
Articulación Acromioclavicular/cirugía , Clavícula/lesiones , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Radiografía , Luxación del Hombro/cirugía , Articulación Acromioclavicular/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación Acromioclavicular/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tornillos Óseos , Clavícula/diagnóstico por imagen , Clavícula/cirugía , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Luxación del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Luxación del Hombro/fisiopatología , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...